The day may come, when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may come one day to be recognized, that the number of the legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum, are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or, perhaps, the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day, or a week, or even a month, old. But suppose the case were otherwise, what would it avail? the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?
-- Jeremy Bentham, from An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789)
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
When it comes to guinea pigs, now you have a choice. You can opt for our standard model that comes complete with hair. Or try our new 1988 stripped down, hairless model for speed and efficiency.
Our euthymic, hairless guinea pigs are the product of years of breeding. They can be used for dermatologic studies for hair producing agents. Skin sensitization. Transdermal therapy. Ultraviolet studies. And more.
-- from guinea pig advertisement in Lab Animal (1988), cited in Peter Singer's Animal Liberation, p 38
Our euthymic, hairless guinea pigs are the product of years of breeding. They can be used for dermatologic studies for hair producing agents. Skin sensitization. Transdermal therapy. Ultraviolet studies. And more.
-- from guinea pig advertisement in Lab Animal (1988), cited in Peter Singer's Animal Liberation, p 38
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Friday, February 6, 2015
Thursday, January 29, 2015
"An analysis of the Intoitus that opens the Systema leaves no doubts about the sense Linnaeus attributed to his maxim [see yesterday's post: 'know thyself' was attributed to Homo]: man has no specific identity other than the ability to recognize himself. Yet to define the human not through any nota characteristica, but rather through his self-knowledge, means that man is the being which recognizes itself as such, that man is the animal that must recognize itself as human to be human."
-- Giorgio Agamben, The Open: Man and Animal, p 25-26
-- Giorgio Agamben, The Open: Man and Animal, p 25-26
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
"In truth, Linnaeus's genius consists not so much in the resoluteness with which he places man among the primates as in the irony with which he does not record---as he does with the other species---any specific identifying characteristic next to the generic name Homo, only the old philosophical adage: nosce te ipsum {know yourself}. Even in the tenth edition, when the complete denomination becomes Homo sapiens, all evidence suggests that the new epithet does not represent a description, but that it is only a simplification of that adage, which, moreover, maintains its position next to the term Homo. It is worth reflecting on this taxonomic anomaly, which assigns not a given, but rather an imperative as a specific difference."
-- Giorgio Agamben, The Open: Man and Animal, p 25
-- Giorgio Agamben, The Open: Man and Animal, p 25
Friday, January 16, 2015
"[...] Freud suggest that the relation to our own death is not representable, and that each time we try to represent our own death to ourselves, we continue to be there as spectators, observers, voyeurs, at a distance and subject to imagery, to imagination. We are alive enough to see ourselves and imagine ourselves dead, and therefore, I would add, buried or swallowed up or cremated alive. This is another way of saying, against Heidegger, that we never have any access to our own death as such, that we are incapable of it. Our death is impossible. Whence Freud concludes, and I quote: "Hence the psycho-analytic school could venture the assertion that at bottom no one believes in his own death, or, to put the same thing in another way, that in the unconscious every one of us is convinced of his own immortality.""
-- Derrida, "The Beast & the Sovereign, Volume II", Sixth Session, p 157
-- Derrida, "The Beast & the Sovereign, Volume II", Sixth Session, p 157
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)